Skip to content
Perth Exoplanet Survey Telescope

Perth Exoplanet Survey Telescope

Searching for New Worlds

Primary Navigation Menu

Menu
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Observatory
    • Description
    • Photometry
    • The PEST pipeline
    • CMOS photometry
  • Research
    • Exoplanet Discoveries
    • Supernova Search
    • Publications
  • About
  • Contact

How bright are these stars?

How bright are these stars?

Share on Facebook Share
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on LinkedIn Share
Send email Mail

Astronomers sometimes blithely talk about ‘bright’ stars.  If an exoplanet transits a bright star, we will be able to measure the the parameters of the planet, eg mass and radius to greater precision, and perhaps to sniff its atmosphere.   But in everyday terms, how bright are these stars?

Astronomers use the magnitude scale to describe star brightness, with the larger the number the dimmer. A magnitude difference of 1 between stars means there is a factor of about 2.51 times brightness between them.  Polaris is mag 2, and Alpha Centauri is -0.3  (yes, magnitudes can be negative).  Go out to a really dark sky site and the dimmest star visible to the naked eye is mag 6.  I’ve had difficulty making out mag 10 stars with an 8″ Newtonian telescope from the suburbs.

Discovered transiting planets by magnitude. Very few are brighter than mag 10. Image Credit: Courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech

 

 

A candle flame. Placed 70 km away it would be as bright as a bright mag 10 star. Image Credit: Matthew Bowden www.digitallyrefreshing.com

Of the transiting planets discovered to date very few are brighter than mag 10.  This is 4 magnitudes dimmer than the dimmest star visible to the naked eye, or 2.514 = 40 times dimmer.  Another way to look at to look at this is to consider a candle flame.   Place this 70 km away (Perth to Mandurah, or Boston to Providence, ignoring the atmosphere and dust) and you’d see it as being as bright as a ‘bright’ mag 10 star.

The distribution of discovered planets pictured above is somewhat distorted because many of them were made from space – the Kepler telescope.  Observations from space benefit from greater stability and therefore ability to detect planets around fainter stars.  Nevertheless ground-based surveys have gone down to mag 15.  HATS-6b is an example.

This is 2.519 = 4000 times dimmer than the dimmest naked eye star.  Placing our candle 600 km away (Boston to Washington DC) would do the trick.

So the astronomer’s ‘bright’ star is actually not very bright at all.  It’s amazing how much information we get from such minute scraps of light.

References

[zotpress items=”H2JMBU94″ style=”nature” urlwrap=”title”]

 

Related

2017-01-29
By: TG Tan
On: January 29, 2017
In: Exoplanets, Photometry
Tagged: astronomy, kepler, transits
Previous Post: Hot Jupiters – plentiful but rare
Next Post: Why there isn’t a planet called PEST-1b

By Thiam-Guan 'TG' Tan

An engineer by background, I get a kick out of bringing the vastness of space into reach through stuff that you can put together at home.

Recent

  • TEDx talk on PEST January 10, 2022
  • Welcome the CMOS Slug January 21, 2021
  • Audacious Ant: Jan 2010 – Sept 2020 October 3, 2020
  • PEST has got to 50… December 24, 2019
  • The PEST pipeline is now available September 15, 2019

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID): 0000-0001-5603-6895

Science collaborations;

Kilodegree Extremely Little Telescope: KELT
Hungarian-made Automated Telescope Network - South: HATS
Microlensing Follow-Up Network: MicroFUN
The MEarth Project
Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite: TESS

Website contents are © TG Tan 2025 unless credited otherwise. The PEST logo is by Bee Ling Tan, designer, architect - and my daughter!